R 36, Free Expression Tunnel Response Act
Referred to the Select Committee on Hate Crimes by the Student Senate President
The Select Committee on Hate Crimes reported the bill to Senate by consent, SCHC-01
Adopted by roll call vote (Adopted: 48-1-3; 6 absent)
Online Text
(as of 11-19-2008, engrossed for signature)
Resolution 36
A RESOLUTION
TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT TO ADDRESS THE INCIDENT THAT OCCURRED IN THE FREE
EXPRESSION TUNNEL ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5TH, 2008
![]()
Short Title: Free Expression Tunnel Response Act (Public)
Sponsors: Senator ADONIS
Secondary Sponsors: Senators Rogers, Webb, Crabtree, Brackett, Chiang, J. Jones, Donnelly, Demanovich, Senator Emeritus Stewart
Signatories: Matthew Woodward
Referred to:
Version: (insert either committee version, as amended by Senate, etc.)
First
![]()
WHEREAS, on Wednesday, November 5th, 2008 four students spray painted hateful, discriminatory, and violent remarks and threats in regards to President-elect Barack Obama in the Free Expression Tunnel; and,
WHEREAS, these and other remarks prompted the University officials
to paint the
tunnel white; and,
WHEREAS, Chancellor Oblinger stated on Wednesday, November 5th, 2008 that “We as a campus community and I as your chancellor- and as a private citizen- value free speech but will not tolerate hateful speech designed to incite violence and undermine the safe operation of campus”; and,
WHEREAS, student leaders agreed in a Student Leaders’ Response to Hate Speech that “We
live by the values of equity for
all people and mutual respect for every member of the human race regardless of
race, color, religion, creed, gender, sexual orientation and expression,
national origin, age, disability, or veteran status”; and,
WHEREAS, Chancellor Oblinger stated on November 14th, 2008 that “…Federal authorities
investigated this incident and determined that the individuals involved did not
present a threat to the President-elect;” and,
WHEREAS, no criminal charges are currently being pressed; therefore, any further actions will be taken by the University; and,
WHEREAS, we recognize that the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20
U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a Federal law that protects the privacy of student records and prevents us from knowing the outcome of any University disciplinary action against these students; and,
WHEREAS, we
further acknowledge that the incident which occurred in the Free Expression Tunnel on Wednesday,
November 5TH, 2008 also revealed student body concerns and confusion
relating to the existence of a University policy that would satisfactorily
address this incident; and,
WHEREAS, the
events on Wednesday, November 5TH, 2008 also indicated a general
lack of visibility and clarity of the harassment policies, and left it questionable
for whether or not these actions would fall under the current Unlawful
Harassment Policy Statement (REG04.25.04); and,
WHEREAS, that the University’s Unlawful Harassment
Policy Statement (REG04.25.04§1.1) declares that, “Harassment based upon race,
color, religion, creed, sex, national origin, age, disability or veteran status
is a form of discrimination in violation of federal and state law and North
Carolina State University policy, and will not be tolerated,” and it also
declares that, “It is the internal policy of North Carolina State University to
prohibit harassment on the basis of sexual orientation”; and,
WHEREAS, the University defines harassment in
REG04.25.04§2.1 as “…unwelcome conduct, based upon race, color, religion,
creed, sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran status or sexual
orientation, that is either a condition of working or learning (quid pro quo)
or creates a hostile environment”; and,
WHEREAS, this
incident has demonstrated that conduct which intimidates individuals or groups
often creates tension within the campus environment, and threatens the
effectiveness of education; and,
WHEREAS, the University recognizes Hostile
Environment Harassment in REG04.25.04 § 2.2-2.2.2 by stating that “Hostile
Environment harassment consists of unwelcome conduct when: such conduct has the
effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work or academic
performance, or such conduct has the effect of creating an intimidating,
hostile or offensive working or learning environment”; now therefore be it
RESOLVED, by the North Carolina State University Student Senate that we formally reject and condemn the actions of these four students as they directly contradict the values of the University and do not represent the views of the student body; and be it further,
RESOLVED, that we strongly urge that these students are punished to the full extent, of our current Policies, Rules, and Regulations; and be it further,
RESOLVED, that we encourage the University’s punishment and education of these individuals to include cross cultural community service, counseling, and diversity education; and be it further,
RESOLVED, that the University’s Unlawful Harassment
Policy be modified to adequately address future incidents which violently target
individuals or University protected groups; and be it further,
RESOLVED,
that the
body, strongly urges the NC State Campus Culture Task Force Committee to reform the current Unlawful Harassment Policy Statement, and any other applicable University regulations, to include language that would explicitly address acts, whether they be verbal, written, or physical, which incite violence or otherwise create a hostile campus environment toward individuals or University protected groups.